ext_22924 ([identity profile] m31andy.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] m31andy 2010-06-25 12:02 pm (UTC)

While these are all sensible options (although a solicitor would probably raise an eyebrow at keeping hold of a fake passport!), I really need the baddie and a newspaper journalist be able to plant/take something in the recepticle without it getting back to the actual owner.

Yes, he did, and apparently it turns out it's easier to hide an arms cache safely than a bit of money and some paperwork! But I also need the stashplace to be instantly recognisable when the owner does find out it's been used - and also access to be highly restricted (but not necessarily need to know)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting